Consider the situation where multiple processes open the same file and append to it. O_APPEND guarantees that the file is found The write operation at the end and then start is atomic. Therefore, as long as each write size is <= PIPE_BUF, multiple processes can attach to the same file, and no process will overwrite the writes of any other process. I write I have a test program in which multiple processes open and write to the same file (write(2)). I made sure that the size of each write is> PIPE_BUF(4k). I look forward to seeing instances where the process overwrites other people’s data. But that didn’t happen. I tested different write sizes. Is that just luck or is there a reason not to?
My ultimate goal is to understand whether multiple processes attached to the same file need to coordinate their writes.
This is the complete plan. Each process creates an int buffer and ranks it with Fill in all the values, open a file and write to it.
Glasses:
OpenMPI 1.4.3 on
Open 11.3 64-bit
Compiled to: mpicc -O3 test .c,
Run mode: mpirun -np 8 ./a.out
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#includeint
main(int argc, char** argv) {
int rank, size, i, bufsize = 134217728, fd, status = 0, bytes_written, tmp_bytes_written;
int* buf;
char* filename = "/tmp/testfile.out";MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &size);buf = (int*) malloc (bufsize * sizeof(int));
if( buf == NULL) {
status = -1;
perror("Could not malloc");
goto finalize;
}
for(i=0; ibuf[i] = rank;
if(-1 == (fd = open(filename, O_APPEND|O_WRONLY, S_IWUSR))) {
perror("Cant open file");
status = -1;
goto end;
exit(-1);
}bytes_written = 0;
if(bufsize != (tmp_bytes_written = write(fd, buf, bufsize)) ) {
perror("Error during write");
printf("ret value: %d
", tmp_bytes_written);
status = -1;
goto close;
}close:
if(-1 == close(fd)) {
perror("Error during close");
status = -1;
}
end:
free(buf);
finalize:
MPI_Finalize();
return status;
}< /pre>
This volume of POSIX.1-2008 does not specify behavior of concurrent
writes to a file from multiple processes. Applications should use some
form of concurr ency control.
...This means yourself – different UNIX likes will provide different guarantees.
From here: Is file append atomic in UNIX
Consider the situation where multiple processes open the same file and append to it. O_APPEND guarantees that it is atomic to find the end of the file and then start the write operation. Therefore, as long as each write The input size is <= PIPE_BUF, multiple processes can be attached to the same file, and any process will not overwrite the writing of any other process. I wrote a test program in which multiple processes open and write to the same File(write(2)). I made sure that each write size is> PIPE_BUF(4k). I expected to see instances where the process overwrites other people’s data. But that didn’t happen. I tested different write sizes. Is it just luck or is there a reason not to?
My ultimate goal is to understand whether multiple processes attached to the same file need to coordinate their writes.
This is the complete plan. Each process creates an int buffer and ranks it with Fill in all the values, open a file and write to it.
Glasses:
OpenMPI 1.4.3 on
Open 11.3 64-bit
Compiled to: mpicc -O3 test .c,
Run mode: mpirun -np 8 ./a.out
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#includeint
main(int argc, char** argv) {
int rank, size, i, bufsize = 134217728, fd, status = 0, bytes_written, tmp_bytes_written;
int* buf;
char* filename = "/tmp/testfile.out";MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &size);buf = (int*) malloc (bufsize * sizeof(int));
if( buf == NULL) {
status = -1;
perror("Could not malloc");
goto finalize;
}
for(i=0; ibuf[i] = rank; if(-1 == (fd = open(filename, O_APPEND|O_WRONLY, S_IWUSR))) {
perror("Cant open file");
status = -1;
goto end ;
exit(-1);
}bytes_written = 0;
if(bufsize != (tmp_bytes_written = write(fd, buf, bufsize))) {
perror("Error during write");
printf("ret value: %d
", tmp_bytes_written);
status = -1;
goto close;< br /> }close:
if(-1 == close(fd)) {
perror("Error during close");
status =- 1;
}
end:
free(buf);
finalize:
MPI_Finalize();
return status;
} pre>The atomicity of writing less than PIPE_BUF only applies to pipes and FIFOs. For file writing, POSIX says:
p>
This volume of POSIX.1-2008 does not specify behavior of concurrent
writes to a file from multiple processes. Applications should use some
form of concurrency control.< /blockquote>
...This means yourself – different UNIX likes will provide no Same guarantee.