What is the best way to handle an integer overflow in C #?

Dealing with integer overflow is a common task, but what is the best way to deal with it in C#? Are there some syntactic sugars that are simpler than other languages? Or is this really the best way?

int x = foo();
int test = x * common;
if(test / common != x)
Console.WriteLine("oh noes!");
else
Console.WriteLine("safe!");

I don’t need to use it often, but you can use checked keywords:

int x = foo() ;
int test = checked(x * common);

If it overflows, it will cause a runtime exception. From MSDN:

In a checked context, if an expression produces a value that is
outside the range of the destination type, the result depends on
whether the expression is constant or non-constant. Constant
expressions cause compile time errors, while non-constant expressions
are evaluated at run time and raise exceptions.

I should also point out that there is another C# keyword, unchecked, and of course not checked Instead and ignore the overflow. You may wonder when to use the unchecked state because it seems to be the default behavior. Well, there is a C# compiler option that defines how to handle expressions other than checked and unchecked: /checked. You can set it under the advanced build settings of the project.

If you have a lot of expressions that need to be checked, the easiest thing is to set the /checked build option. Then, any overflow expressions, unless not After checking the package, otherwise it will cause runtime exception.

Handling integer overflow is a common task, but what is the best way to handle it in C#? Are there some syntactic sugars that are simpler than other languages? Or is this really the best way?

int x = foo();
int test = x * common;
if(test / common != x)
Console.WriteLine("oh noes!");
else
Console.WriteLine("safe!");

I don’t need to use it often, but you can use the checked keyword:

int x = foo();
int test = checked(x * common);

If it overflows, it will cause runtime exceptions. From MSDN:

In a checked context, if an expression produces a value that is
outside the range of the destination type, the result depends on
whether the expression is constant or non-constant. Constant
expressions cause compile time errors, while non-constant expressions
are evaluated at run time and raise exceptions.

I should also point out that there is another C# keyword, unchecked, of course the opposite of checking and ignoring overflows. You may wonder when to use Unchecked because it seems to be the default behavior. Well, there is a C# compiler option that defines how to handle expressions other than checked and unchecked: /checked. You can set it under the advanced build settings of the project.

If you have a lot of expressions that need to be checked, the simplest thing is to set the /checked build option. Then, any overflowing expression, unless wrapped without checking, will cause a runtime exception. < /p>

WordPress database error: [Table 'yf99682.wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments' doesn't exist]
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_ID FROM wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments WHERE ( comment_approved = '1' ) AND comment_post_ID = 3102 ORDER BY wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_date_gmt ASC, wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_ID ASC

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.