FONTS – Differences only for font browsers for specific font weights

By Browser

For normal font weight, Google font LATO font looks thinner on Firefox than Chrome (and for bold font weight, there is no difference). -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased ; (As shown in several answers) did not help. Are there any suggestions for resolving this discrepancy?

enter image description here

< div class="content-split">

Load the subset you need (perhaps Latin) locally instead of loading it through the Google Fonts API. This may solve your problem Problem.

Google Chrome seems to ignore the subset you requested, it gets all available subsets and their unicode ranges, and downloads them based on the character types found in the entire page.

p>

For normal font weights, the Google font LATO font looks thinner on Firefox than Chrome (and for bold fonts, there is no difference). -webkit-font-smoothing : Antialiased; (as shown in several answers) did not help. Are there any suggestions for resolving this discrepancy?

enter image description here

< p>

Load the subset you need (probably in Latin) locally instead of through the Google Fonts API. This may solve your problem.

Google Chrome seems to ignore the subset you requested, it gets all available subsets and their unicode ranges, and downloads them based on the type of characters found in the entire page.

, , , , , , ,

WordPress database error: [Table 'yf99682.wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments' doesn't exist]
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_ID FROM wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments WHERE ( comment_approved = '1' ) AND comment_post_ID = 4260 ORDER BY wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_date_gmt ASC, wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_ID ASC

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.