Delete the second RAID6 drive during the first failed resynchronization?

I have a RAID6 consisting of five 1TB drives and it works fine. I want to redistribute the array in different ways in my system (change the drive allocation through the controller card). I I pulled the first drive where I wanted it; now I only have one drive left. Since it is RAID6, it should have dual drive redundancy; will this extend the time during resynchronization? Can I pull the second drive even though the array still resynchronizes to the first moved drive? If so, can I restart resynchronization on two moving drives at the same time?
For RAID6 arrays, you must be able to do this, you just push the array to handle the second drive failure, which This is the purpose of RAID 6.

I will not do this on a production system. The main reason for choosing RAID 6 is that you are concerned about a single (additional) drive failure or a single read failure during the reconstruction process. The possibility is paranoid. By performing a RAID6 dual drive failure situation, you will put the array in a situation where a true single drive failure or a read failure will cause it to terminate. This will be a risk, I would rather not take the array, I think it is necessary first RAID 6. If the performance loss during the reconstruction process did not cause you to die, I suggest letting the first resynchronization complete, and then moving the second drive so that your system is always protected.

p>

I have a RAID6 consisting of five 1TB drives and it works fine. I want to redistribute the array in a different way in my system (change the drive allocation through the controller card). I pull the first drive I got where I wanted; now I only have one drive left. Since it is RAID6, it should have dual drive redundancy; will this extend the time to the resynchronization period? Can I pull the second drive even though the array still resynchronizes to the first moved drive? If so, can I restart resynchronization on two moving drives at the same time?

For a RAID 6 array, you must be able to do this, you just push the array to handle the second drive failure, which is exactly what RAID 6 is for.

I will not do this on a production system. The main reason for choosing RAID6 is that you are paranoid about the possibility of a single (additional) drive failure or a single read failure during the reconstruction process. By performing a RAID6 dual drive failure scenario , You will leave the array in a situation where a real single drive failure or read failure will cause it to terminate. This will be a risk, I would rather not take the array, I think RAID is needed first 6. If the performance loss during the reconstruction process does not result You die, I suggest to let the first resynchronization complete, and then move the second drive so that your system is always protected.

WordPress database error: [Table 'yf99682.wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments' doesn't exist]
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_ID FROM wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments WHERE ( comment_approved = '1' ) AND comment_post_ID = 1445 ORDER BY wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_date_gmt ASC, wp_s6mz6tyggq_comments.comment_ID ASC

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.