Cache – Does anyone tried to use ZooKeeper?

I am currently researching memcached as a method of coordinating a group of servers, but I ran into Apache’s ZooKeeper along the way. It looks interesting, Yahoo uses it, so it shouldn’t be broken, but I used to Never heard of it, so I am a little skeptical. Does anyone else give it a try? Any comments or thoughts?
ZooKeeper and Memcached have different purposes. You can use memcached for server coordination, but you have to do most of the work yourself Memcached only allows coordination because it caches common data lookups used by multiple clients. From reading ZooKeeper’s documentation, its focus is much more than that. ZooKeeper seems to provide support for server clusters, which is the same as that provided by memcached Cache clusters are different.

Check out Brad Fitzpatrick’s Linux Journal article on memcached to better understand what I mean.

I I am currently working on memcached as a method of coordinating a group of servers, but came across Apache’s ZooKeeper along the way. It looks interesting and Yahoo uses it, so it shouldn’t be broken, but I’ve never heard of it before, so I’m a little skeptical. Also Has anyone else tried it? Any comments or thoughts?

ZooKeeper and Memcached have different purposes. You can use memcached for server coordination, but you have to do most of the work yourself. Memcached only allows coordination because it caches multiple clients Common data lookups used on the end. From reading ZooKeeper’s documentation, its focus is much more than that. ZooKeeper seems to provide support for server clusters, which is different from the cache clusters provided by memcached.

< p>Check out Brad Fitzpatrick’s Linux Journal article on memcached to better understand what I mean.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.